Thorns FC: Well-deserved

Has there been a more bipolar club in this league this season than the Thorns?

Start the season by being spectacularly wrecked in under an hour by Kansas City? Then thrash out a dour good-news-bad-news 1-1 draw against ACFC? Follow that with a wild how-did-this-end-in-a-scoreless bunfight with The Damned Courage? Go to Utah and play three quarters of an hour of “solid road win” followed by a “how-can-we-throw-these-points-away-oh-never-mind” second half?

Then drive up I-5 and drop all those points in another weird not-good-but-also-not-lucky trainwreck complete with Laura Harvey sufferball?

Then…go utterly nuts in the final half hour to thump visiting Gotham! Follow that by shipping three goals to a crap Louisville side (but score three to pull out a gift home point), and then…

…for the first time all season, put together a complete, solid-performance win against the other co-league-leading club, Orlando.

Go figure.

Especially because of the way this match started. Here’s my notes from the first quarter hour of tape review:
1′ – Barbara Banda runs through the Portland backline; Makenzie Arnold out well to clear the lead pass away before Banda can collect.
9′ – Banda through again, but offside.
11′ – Route One to Banda (Hiatt woolgathering, WTF?!) who drops a short pass to Marta whose good shot is blocked.
13′ – Another Orlando attack results in a Hiatt block over the byline for a corner kick which is cleared but recycled; finally Arnold has to make a good take to end the possession.

Portland? Nothing. For a quarter hour, not a goddamn thing; literally barely a foray across the midfield stripe.

But then in the 16th minute the Thorns pushed up the right flank and forced Orlando to knock into touch. Isabella Obaze took the throw-in and hit Reilyn Turner, who played the 1-2 back to Obaze, who found Olivia Moultrie at the near edge of the 18. Moultrie didn’t have any particularly good options other than to try and force a low cross in to Turner.

But Turner was (as you can see) pretty well covered, and could only drop to Reina Reyes inside the penalty arch:

Reyes took a nifty little backheel-to-herself to slide across the arch but she had a peach-colored wall in front of her. This also looked like nothing until…

…Reyes bent the ball into the far post for what turned out to be the matchwinner.

Talk about “something out of nothing”, both from the match to that point and from that sequence!

Not to take anything from Reyes’ golazo; the ball was struck well, bent sweetly, and took advantage of her opponents screening their own keeper.

But when the smoke cleared there I was on in the stands thinking; Oh, shit. Orlando, Banda, Marta, Watt…there’s no fucking way we can make this stand up.

Until we did.

For several reasons:
Excellent team defending. For the first time all season Ken stuck a genuine center forward – Turner – at center forward. Turner started the defending with outstanding hold-up play.

The midfield was anchored by Sam Coffey and Hina Sugita; enough said.

Here’s an interesting note; I thought at the time that for much of the match the Thorns midfield and backline stayed compact and disciplined. Orlando thrives on open space; Banda running through, as she started out doing in the opening quarter hour, and especially Marta, the ultimate midfield string-puller. As the match went on I thought the Thorns denied her that space.

Carlisle-sensei had other thoughts, though. See the passing diagrams. Okay; agree to disagree. But along with that, there was a lot of…
Excellent individual defending. Particularly in the backline. Here’s a perfect example of that, starting with Banda in possession deep in Portland’s defensive third. She’s well marked by Hiatt but is looking to find Marta open inside, finds her, and feeds her.

Marta turns with the ball, and…

has the ball tackled right off her foot by Obaze, who’s seamlessly switched inside when Hiatt pushed wide to front up Banda.

Notice where the other black shirts are; Orlando has no options once Banda passes to Marta and Marta is stripped. Attack over.

Better still, Obaze looks to find an outlet – which, admittedly, was a bit of a struggle this match; Portland still has issues playing out of the back – but this time has Turner upfield instead of Castellanos;

Turner doesn’t have anything in front of her. But that’s okay! Instead of trying to force a run into traffic and get tackled for loss, or force a bad pass to turn over (sorry, Castellanos, but I’m looking at you…) Turner holds the ball, back to goal, and then drops calmly to Coffey when Sam gets open, just after this screenshot.

That’s how you stymie a running attack like Orlando’s. Hold up top, keep spacing in midfield, solid team defending in back, good goalkeeping.

FBRef had Ally Watt as Orlando’s biggest threat (0.7xG), and most of that came from a single 62nd minute shot (0.52xG/0.59 post-shot xG) against which Arnold made a terrific kick-save.

Banda? 0.5xG from six shots, highest PSxG 0.1. Marta? 0.2xG from two shots.

On one hand, this could have been a more definitive win, mind; substitute Payton Linnehan had the best Thorns opportunity all evening, a solo run in the 82nd minute that she should have buried but between last-second defensive pressure and her own poor touch went wide left.

On the other, here’s a caveat worth considering, though. We’ll see when we look at possession, but Orlando had a lot of the ball in the second half.

Which was utterly fucking shattered into pieces by long injury breaks and VAR pauses.

I felt like every time Orlando started to build up some steam, someone would go down hard, or center referee Nabil Bensalah would be standing there with his hand to his ear waving a player away whilst chatting with Anya Voigt in the VAR room.

Would a less-choppy second half have changed things? I dunno, but it’s a thought.

Here’s Carlisle Sensei on the “vibes” from this match:

That’s…fair enough; after beating Orlando and Gotham? “In-form” seems not unpossible. But…but…

Don’t get me wrong. This was an outstanding match. Not just the win, but solid team play all over; this was a Thorns squad playing like they had a plan and knew how to execute it. That was gorgeous and fun and great to see.

But we haven’t seen that consistently so far. There’s been a LOT of KenBall since Kansas City away.

One swallow doesn’t make a summer, and one win – regardless of how good a win – a season.

I’m hopeful, though, for the first time all season.

But just a little hopeful. I’m also patient, and a natural skeptic.

Can Ken & Co. build on this?

Let’s see what happens next.

Partner-assisted soccer yoga? World chase tag? Twerking?

Short Passes

OPTA shows Portland being outpossessed by a wide margin, 42% to 58%. That seems right; Orlando had a lot of the ball, but mostly in the second half.

Which was as stop-and-go as we’ve discussed. The Thorns had their moments – indeed, we’ve mentioned the 82nd minute! – but fewer and fewer as the match went on.

Here’s Carlisle’s “xG race” plot:

And here’s his passing plots. First Portland:

Yeah, that’s a pretty weird look. I agree, sensei. Also the suit. WTF, Ken? That was not something grown men wear in public.

We’ll talk more about Castellanos, Turner, and Moultrie in the comments, but there’s a fair bit of truth in that Orlando really didn’t look sharp moving to space and passing. How much of that was them and how much was Coffey – and Hina-san, and Moultrie, and the fullbacks – doing “Sam Coffey things”, though? I

I’m not sure. Yet.

Here’s Orlando:

I think a lot of the “Banda was much closer to Marta” was that Obaze and Hiatt were pressing her high and forcing Banda backward to receive service (when she could…) and Perry and Reyes doing a similar workover to isolate Watt. Hard to be sure, but it looked to me as much like Portland’s hard graft as Orlando struggling.

Again…I think we need to put a pin in this game and see what happens over the next several matches to see if this was part of an actual trend or just a one-off…

Turnover and over.

Here’s how things are going;

Opponent (Result) – 2025Turnovers
Kansas City – Away (L)38
Angel City – Home (D)38
North Carolina – Home (D)32
Utah – Away (W)25
Seattle – Away (L)34
Gotham – Home (W)26
Louisville – Home (D)16
Orlando – Home (W)18

As opposed to Louisville this was due to Portland tidiness; only nine turnovers in each half. Orlando was better; 15, five in the first half, 10 in the second. Well played, both teams.

The Thorns’ Semi-Biggest Losers were Moultrie, Turner, and Reyes, but with only three each. Perry turned over twice. Nobody else with more than a single turnover.

Portland didn’t have any really ugly giveaways outside Perry’s heavy touch that sprang Banda in the 62nd minute for the Watt shot we discussed. But Orlando had a similar hairball, coughing up a pass to Hina-san who used it to tee up Moultrie and forced Moorhouse to make a huge blocking save. Honors even, then.

press!

Fifth match tracking the effect of each side’s press. I counted either a 1) turnover (either from a tackle-for-loss or a mishit forced pass), or a 2) forced retreat or drop-pass that killed off a progressive action, as a pressing “win”.

Here’s the results:

Match timePride presses (wins)(%)Thorns presses (wins)(%)
0-15′11(10) (90.9%)7(5) (71.4%)
15-30′6(3) (50%)10(7) (70%)
30-45+1′5(1) (20%)5(2) (40%)
First half22(14) (63.6%)21(14) (66.6%)
45-60′4(2) (50%)5(2) (40%)
60-75′1(1) (100%)8(3) (37.5%)
75-90+11′1(0) (0%)9(5) (55.5%)
Second half6(3) (50%)22(10) (45.4%)
Match Total28(17) (60.7%)43(24) (55.8%)

My thoughts about this:
1) Neither side really pressed very well in terms of “success”; Overall only a result about half to less than two-thirds the time, while Orlando forced a Portland turnover (as opposed to a drop or retreat) slightly less than a third of the time (nine of the 28). Portland slightly less; 13 of their 43, or about 30% of their presses.
2) I’m intrigued to see the Orlando press fading, and the Portland pressing growing, as the match went on. Makes sense, though; Orlando was chasing, Portland parking.
3) The Thorns most active pressers were Coffey (10 attempts) and Moultrie (8 attempts). Alidou tried six times, Hina four, and several others had three press attempts.
4) Coffey was only successful half the time, Moultrie slightly better, winning five of her eight. Alidou won half, too. The most successful were Hiatt and Reyes, winning all of their three press attempts. Hina-san won three of her four.
5) The Thorn most victimized by Orlando was Castellanos by a huge margin (eight attempts, five losses). Moultrie and Reyes were pressed six and five times, respectively, with Moultrie slipping her presser a third of the time (two of six) while Reyes won three of five.
6) What’s instructive is that the two Portland DMs were pressed only lightly; Hina-san four times, Coffey only twice, and Coffey slid away from one of the two. Hina lost three of her four defensive challenges.

The real bottom line is that Portland got an early goal and was able to make it stand up. Orlando needed to turn the ball over more, and closer to Portland’s goal (since the Thorns were cutting off their runs and service) and couldn’t.

Here’s the running tally:

Match (Result)Opponent Press (Success)Thorns Press (Success)
Utah Away (W)28/12 (42.8%)27/15 (55.5%)
Seattle Away (L)32/23 (71.8%)21/15 (71.4%)
Gotham Home (W)28(20) (71.4%)19(15) (78.9%)
Louisville Home (D)34/25 (73.5%)14/8 (57.1%)
Orlando Home (W)28/17 (60.7%)43/24 (55.8%)

More to come.

Corner Kicks

Two. Both laaate second half, both pure timewasting.

TimeTakerShort/Long?Result
90+5′MoultrieShortTo Coffey, who held the ball up for a time but was finally tackled and turned over.
90+10′CoffeyShortTo Linnehan, but her touch was heavy and turned over nearly immediately.

Meh. Didn’t get anything, didn’t need anything.

Player Ratings and Comments

Alidou (71′ – +8/-0 : +2/-0 : +10/-0) Young Alidou did a lot more good defensive work than attack (five of her pluses are defensive, and FBRef has her with a cumulative xG of 0.14 off one shot). So not a bad shift on the day, but I’m not sure the whole “winger problem” is really solved. Ken still has more forwards than he can play because so many of them are center forwards and so few are true wingers.

I like what she brings, though, so I hope she continues to start to see if she can start bringing more attack.

Linnehan (19′ – +6/-1) A combination of “good work” (dangerous attack, tough tracking back) and “frustrating” (the missed chance to put this one away). I’m starting to like Linnehan more as a substitute, though, so let’s see if this continues to work.

Turner (71′ – +7/-0 : +2/-0 : +9/-0) Remember how we kept saying “Reilyn Turner is not a winger”? That’s because Reilyn Turner is a center forward, and when you play her there, she does what center forwards can do and good things happen. We’ve mentioned the holdup play, but she also got the assist and provided some danger going forward. Needs to put more of her rounds on target if she’s going to continue at the #9, but a good start.

Castellanos (88′ – +4/-2 : +3/-3 : +7/-5) I’d still like to see her 1) control the ball better in tight space; you’re supposed to be a #10, Deyna…”ball control” is kind of what they do, 2) hold onto the ball better (see the “pressing” stats, above), and 3) shoot better. Two shots off target? C’mon. If you’re going to start over players like Fleming or Hanks or Tordin, you need to show something more positive.

In fairness, this was much better from Castellanos that we’ve seen so far, though. So…

Hirst (~13′ – no rating)

Fleming (19′ – +2/-0) Saw out the win working hard. Nothing remarkable, but a good solid working shift.

Moultrie (96′ – +7/-2 : +5/-1 : +12/-3) Good game with the caveat that she had the same issue as Turner did. Moultrie took four shots, put only half on target, and got only 0.19xG (0.22 PSxG) out of them. I’m thrilled to see Livvy busting her butt on defense, but how about a bit more the other way? You can score, you have in the past…now?

Tordin (~5′ – +3/-0) This…

…was pure fun. Tordin took the ball into the far northwest corner and just played footsie with it to waste time and fuck with Orlando. She eventually drew two defenders but still nicked a corner kick out her little skill demonstration. The NWSL+ announcer mistook her for Sugita which was, indeed, quite the compliment.

Coffey (+8/-1 : +3/-0 : +11/-1) All the Thorns defenders – DMs and backs – share a similar issue with PMRs for this match.

The squad defended as a unit. Players marked well, moved to close down space, covered for each other, showing a level of communication and discipline and understanding I don’t think we’ve seen up to this point.

That meant that nobody had to make “big” defensive plays, though, of the sort that earn pluses. Sam Coffey had a night like that; good solid defensive work and useful passes. So, yes; Coffey had an excellent match. No, her PMR doesn’t look like that. But her real plus comes from the scoreline, and that’s all she needed to see.

Sugita (+14/-1 : +5/-0 : +19/-1) My pick for Woman of the Match again, providing service to the forwards and cover for the backline. I still kind of miss her in the attack, but she’s doing the hard work in back the team needs, so. Her clever footwork is always such a treat, you could say it’s almost Tordinesque.

Reyes (+5/-2 : +6/-0 : +11/-2) You takes your goals when you gets ’em, right? An xG of 0.1? Hah! Reina Reyes laughs at your xG. Reyes also laughs at your Ally Watt; she’s got that wench in her pocket.

Sofascore had Reyes as WotM by a huge margin, and if you agree I won’t fight that. She had a huge game, and the club owes her for the hours she spent in practice working on that shot. Brava, Reyes!

Perry (+5/-2 : +3/-2 : +8/-4) A couple of rookie moments, but overall? Another fine match from our kid centerback. I’m impressed both at her field vision and understanding with her unit; she’s a damn quick study. If she continues to start and play at this level I won’t be unhappy.

Hiatt (+4/-2 : +4/-2 : +8/-4) Perry’s progress has made Hiatt my “back I worry about”, though, and she did have some issues; caught lollygagging on the Banda run in the 11th minute, and was doing something (texting? ballwatching?) when Marta blew her doors off in the 28th minute.

But in general? Solid and, like her unit, kept Orlando in front of them and largely in check.

Obaze (89′ – +6/-1 : +1/-0 : +7/-1) As discussed, with Hiatt helped put a muzzle on Banda and Marta and kept them controlled most of the game. I wondered which centerback had “drawn the short fullback straw” before kickoff, but Obaze performed like she’d been running the touchline her whole life. Well done.

McKenzie (~12′ – no rating)

Arnold (+3/-0 : +3/-0 : +6/-0) For a match in which the opponent racked up an xG barely over one (if that; FBref has Orlando at 0.9 for the match) Arnold had to come up huge numerous times.

This included being alert to come off her line to clean out Orlando long balls such as the 1st minute clearance we mentioned above. Saves include the monster 28th minute block, the Watt 62nd kick-save, another couple of big blocks in the 65th minute, and a strong take off a looping Banda shoss in the 84th minute.

Coach Ken: Okay. You got me; big props for this one. The squad looked ready, well-drilled, confident, and cohesive. Finally figured out the whole “Turner is not a winger” thing.

(No, you don’t get credit for that. Seeing a battleship in the driveway doesn’t count as “perception”…)

Keep doing this and I’ll get off your butt.

But the reward for good work is more work! For you and the gang that’s a long two-week road swing; San Diego this coming weekend, then a long Champions Cup swing through Mexico, the back to California for Bay FC in early June.

BFC is kind of a mystery wrapped in an enigma (WTF is going on with the “investigations”, and Montoya?) but the Wave is outright good.

Get all the road points in San Diego?

Go ahead. I dare ya.

Final CommentS:

I yield to no one in my poor opinion of Corbyn May, the nincompoop CR responsible for the Racing atrocity here a couple weeks ago, but in some respects our guy Bensalah who called this one was – not worse! Christ, a chimpanzee would have called that Louisville match better than May did – but more frustrating.

For example, this…

..was a foul ON Sam Coffey, the one Haley McCutcheon is flipping over in the air like a bit of WWE kayfabe. And that was just the one.

Bensalah was wildly inconsistent, calling ticky-tacky little pushes while looking at stuff like this…

..and seeing not a full-on-studs-up-from-behind-red-card-worthy cleating but a business-as-usual foul and one that he considered barely caution-worthy. Notice the location of blue shirt in both screenshots? Yeah, it’s not like the guy wasn’t in position to see this stuff.

I get that officiating is subjective. But if you’re going to be subjective, at least be subjective in a consistent way. If you’re not going to protect the players, at least let them know they can protect themselves, can retaliate without fear of a sending-off.

Play by the rules, or play jungleball, but don’t play the rules one minute and jungleball the next. Give the players a chance to figure out what you’re gonna call and what you’re not.

If they don’t know? That’s going to affect the match, and is likely to get someone hurt.

And preventing that is the single most important part of your job.

Do your fucking job.

Also…

You know you’ve made the Big Time when even the mannequins at the “Fantasy” smutty clothing store across the street from the field are flying your colors.

Oh, my. “By Any Other Name”, indeed.

John Lawes
Latest posts by John Lawes (see all)

14 thoughts on “Thorns FC: Well-deserved

  1. A: Reyna Reyes was the woman of the game, due to her relentless defending of Banda and the goal scored.

    B. Perry was good. Despite flubbing, better that Torpey.

    C. Obaze played the game of her life against Marta and Banda (yes there were some misses)

    D. once again, Coffey was great.

    E. Hina, once again, was great

    F. Macca came up with the saves when needed.

    G. win for PTFC.

    H.Castellanos was… Well, a play maker. She wasn’t great on goal but she made things happen. She’s… kinda good at that. Not her biggest fan but I’m willing to grant that.

    I. Caught all of us off guard but…woof*ckinhoo!!!

    0
    1. Yep. Good individual play, solid team win.

      My only pushback is 1) on Reyes, who mostly faced off against Watt rather than Banda – that was mostly Obaze and Hiatt. But Watt is a big part of Orlando’s attack, and Reyes and Perry (as the passing chart shows) kept her locked down on an island, so just as big a critical part of this win. Given that and the goal? You’re not alone, and not unreasonable, to hand her WotM. I’m an unashamed Hina fanboi, so I see her grinding away and want to recognize her. But Reyes was a brighter light in this one.

      And 2) on Arnold; she didn’t just come up with saves “when needed”. She bossed her penalty area, came out smartly to clear away long balls, single-handedly saved two points kicking out Watt’s shot…it’s time to put away the five games on 2024 and acknowledge her fine work this season. She’s been one of the best in the league so far. I’m still not sold on her as up there with “prime Sheridan” as quality overall. But so far? She’s been huge.

      The big question mark is still “can they repeat this consistently”?

      I mean, this squad played a hell of a second half to beat Gotham, too…then slumped into a poor draw against Louisville.

      So I think we need to just enjoy this for what it was and keep an eye on the road swing; results in San Diego and LA? THAT might be a huge sign that this club really is coming around.

      1
  2. Thanks for the write-up. It was hard for me to pick a WOTM because we had several players come up big – Sugita, Moultrie, Reyes, Arnold. And equally important to the outcome of the game, we had solid shifts from many others – Perry, Obaze, Alidou, and Turner had good games, Castellanos was better than we’d seen her yet, and in Fleming’s short time on the field, she did solid work shutting down Orlando. (Fleming in general has been quietly effective this year, a noticeable step up from last year.) But the thing I noticed the most was that our *effort* was there for the entire game. Players got tired and couldn’t run as fast, but they didn’t stop playing with intensity. Keep it up, Thorns!

    Also while I didn’t love the refereeing this game, the two examples you show were, I thought, called correctly. Lemos’s 42nd-minute stomp was at foot level and on the side of the foot, which makes it a yellow card, not a red. Reds are typically given for cleatings higher than the foot, or for some refs, higher than the ankle. And in the Coffey/McCutcheon one, McCutcheon clearly has position on the ball; it’s Coffey’s responsibility to not run into McCutcheon, not McCutcheon’s to avoid Coffey. McCutcheon did stick her butt out, so the situation is slightly ambiguous, but I thought the foul was more by Coffey than by McCutcheon. There were, however, a bunch of other calls where there was mild contact and the ref blew for a foul, and then didn’t blow the whistle on much heavier contact. As you say it was inconsistent, which isn’t good for anyone.

    0
    1. My thoughts on the two screenshots are:
      If that’s not on McCutcheon (and I’m willing to buy the argument…) then the McCutcheon/Coffey contact is pretty much no foul, just incidental contact. Coffey didn’t swarm over McCutcheon, they collided body-to-body, McCutcheon made a back, and flipped Coffey over it.

      I’d be willing to buy no foul…but blowing Coffey up for that? Mmmmmno.

      And Lemos came in hot, dove in hard, studs up, from behind, and cleated the shit out of Turner’s foot. That’s at least an immediate yellow and a stern lecture; I’ve seen red for less. That’s a BAD foul, but it seemed to just kind of fall in with the weird variation of nothing-for-hard-tackles-but-whistles-for-ticky-handgrabs-or-bumps he was doing.

      I’m generally pretty “meh” on officials. They are what they are, and as a player you deal with them like you deal with a slick pitch or a nasty crowd or a hot day. But with those at least they’re consistent! Bensalah was really NOT consistent, and that made things all the more difficult for the players.

      0
  3. It was so nice having Coffey back, it really made a difference in this game. I just wish we had a competent defensive midfielder to pair with her, because she is really good going forward.

    I’m pretty much over the Castellanos experiment. I’m just not seeing production out of her, even though I can see the talent she has. It feels like she gives up the ball too easily, and while she is okay on set pieces I don’t see enough to justify the amount of time she is on the field.

    But that being said, this was the best game the Thorns have played this year, and possibly in the Gale era. I really hope there is a change in how the team plays. Beating both Gotham and Orlando are really good steps, lets hope they play is repeatable.

    1
    1. We do! But it’s Hina-san, who isn’t my first pick for DM simply because she’s so good creating. I’d like to see Ken try and plug in some of the reserves we haven’t tried much, like Hirst…but then the question is who sits if Sugita moves up to the ACM/#10? Moultrie is playing really well this season. So is Fleming. I’d sit Castellanos, but that doesn’t seem do-able. I’m not done with her; there seems to be quality there. But she needs to show more of it if she’s gonna keep starting. And she’s NOT a CF, or a winger, and Ken doesn’t really use #10s well. So if Turner or Tordin is CF, Hanks is LW, and Linnehan/Alidou is RW…where does Castellanos go?

      Last season the squad played an excellent match at Washington during the Dead-Cat Bounce. It tends to get lost in the welter of tomato cans then, but I’d say that it and this one are the best full-team efforts I’ve seen in the Ken Era. As we saw last year, that quality wasn’t sustained after the Spirit away match. The challenge is to change that this season. I’d love it if that happens…but…we’ll see.

      1
      1. Getting another DM to play next to Coffey is just a wish, and that is problem that KK gave us. I just really like seeing Coffey go forward because it shows how good she can be.

        I get the desire to unlock Castellanos, but right now it just isn’t happening. I don’t think she is so good that either Fleming or Moultre should be on the bench behind her. Nor do I think that she shows a lot more than Alidou or Hanks. At this time I would prefer to see any of these other players.

        0
        1. I think we may have the double pivot, just haven’t seen her. Hirst? Boeckmsn? Wade-Katoa (once she’s healthy…)? Hard to say, but the fact we needed a backup #6 has been evident for some time and, yes, it was on LeBlanc for not doing something about it.

          Neither Hanks nor Alidou really does what Castellanos should be doing. They’re wingers, she’s an ACM. But I agree that her skillset overlaps heavily with Moultrie and to some extent Fleming, so it’s not unreasonable to see them as preferable to her. I just keep seeing flashes from her that make me hopeful, but…I think she needs to be on the clock. She needs to produce. Soon. If not, well…

          0
    1. I just thought it was odd. Banda is usually a bulldozer; she muscles her way past defenders. It often works and I think she tried that on Obaze a couple of times (and Hiatt, too…). They stood tall, and so I think the diving was her Plan B.

      She doesn’t do it well, though (Moultrie could school her there…) and, no, Bensalah mostly didn’t buy it. But it seemed just so really weird that at the time I kind of shrugged, like when something is so far outside your experience that you “deal” with it by just not dealing with it.

      0
  4. From the lows of the Louisville game to pride I felt after the Orlando game. Wow! There were a lot of roses to hand out.
    But now San Diego and San Diego is a better team and on their own field. Thorns are a young squad on the road…scary. But San Diego is Jayden Perry’s hometown I think; plus no jet lag so we could see a pretty alert squad, San Diego worries me but this team surprises me. If he starts the same squad as he did against Orlando and makes the same subs, color me optimistic, especially if Hanks is available. She is a bomb. Could be a UXB or could be a destroyer of Waves.

    0
    1. I know, I know…nobody wants to hear this, but. Remember how good we looked against Washington here last May? Or the rocking half-hour against Gotham last month?

      So far we’ve had exactly one. One. Complete good match so far this season.

      If your N = 1? You don’t have a “data set”. You have a data point. The old joke about an engineer applies here (“One data point and a regression line calculated out to three significant figures”).

      So let’s enjoy the roses from this one for the rest of the week and then sit back carefully and see what happens in San Diego. And Mexico. And San Francisco.

      As you pointed out; so far the last three games were 1) an hour’s lifeless draw then 2) half an hour thumping win over Gotham, followed by 3) an undeserved and scatterbrained draw to Louisville, one of the worst teams this season, and finally 4) an excellently played win over Orlando. Which of these is “this team”?

      I dunno. And I think until we see more from them none of us do.

      If they really ARE rounding into the sort of form we saw here last Saturday?

      That’ll be terrific.

      1
  5. LOL. I am a bit like this unfortunately.
    If your N = 1? You don’t have a “data set”. You have a data point. The old joke about an engineer applies here (“One data point and a regression line calculated out to three significant figures”).
    Also, I am often guilty of generalizing too much. I have always believed that there are two types of people: Those that think there are two types of people and those that don’t. But I would like to see the Thorns be less the ugly play and then a great effort and instead more of a spectrum: like beating the teams you should, being respectably good against the Thorn’s equals (San Diego, for example) and at least at home, being like the Orlando game; surprising us against a team that is considered much better.
    Next year I am hoping this team is one of the best in the league. They could be!

    0
    1. They could be this season, too!

      For all that this was just one game, it was a very good game. Solid all over; as individuals, as a team. The sort of game that COULD turn a season around!

      Will it? As I mentioned, we’ve had good games before under Ken and the magic didn’t hold. Forgive me for being skeptical, but ISTM that if there was soccer coaching genius under that brown suit Ken would have found it before now.

      But, yeah, we need to see what happens over the next month or so.

      1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.